The Sterling Years: Small Arms and the Men

by JamesEdmiston (Author)

• Used

  Paperback
  2011

  $7.39

  This is the story of the manufacture, development and usage of one of the most famous submachine Guns ever produced by a British Firm Designed at the end of WW2 it saw limited use on a trial basis, carried by paratroopers during the battle of Arnhem, but since the British Forces had plenty of Sten guns at the time, and tests between the two types of weapon were inconclusive, it was not until 1953, that with a few adjustments, the Weapon was formally adopted by the British Army Whilst not the most accurate of weapons, it was extremely useful in urban warfare and regarded as one of the most reliable submachine Guns throughout the world until it was withdrawn in 1988. A total of over 400,000 were manufactured. Sterling built them for the British armed forces and for overseas sales. The Sterling Guns was used as the basis for the weapons used by Storm Troopers in the Star Wars films.

• Used

  Hardcover
  1992

  $13.98

  Almost by accident, James Edmiston became involved in owning and running the Sterling Armament Company for 12 years. The company's products sold in around 100 countries, and the battleship engineering of the Mark 4 sub-machine gun won that product the reputation of being probably the world's most reliable automatic weapon. Sterling was engaged almost entirely in export, and there is probably no other (British) defence company that can boast a similar record of success. The product, designed and developed for ruthless efficiency in the support of the armies of friendly governments and their forces of law and order, was primarily a killing machine, and secondarily, a deterrent. Its manufacture (carried out entirely in-house) was under private control, but its sales and their ultimate moral responsibility were the domain of the British Government. But even the foreign policy experts advising a government cannot accurately predict the future. But as time progressed, the very success and efficiency of a small private concern generated hostility and near impossible trading conditions, not from foreign competition, but from elements of that nebulous concern the British Government itself. In spite of strong encouragement and support from various quarters, the exposure of some civil service inefficiency led to governmental deceit and perfidy. It is a disturbing relation of conduct by authority that most Britons would not deem possible in a Western democracy.