by Lorien Foote (Author)
Finalist for the 2011 GilderLehrman Lincoln Prize A seminal work. . . . One ofthe best examples of new, sophisticated scholarship on the social history ofCivil War soldiers. -The Journal of Southern History Will undoubtedly, and properly, beread as the latest word on the role of manhood in the internal dynamics of theUnion army. -Journal of the Civil War Era During the Civil War, the Unionarmy appeared cohesive enough to withstand four years of grueling war againstthe Confederates and to claim victory in 1865. But fractiousness bubbled belowthe surface of the North's presumably united front. Internal fissures were rifewithin the Union army: class divisions, regional antagonisms, ideologicaldifferences, and conflicting personalities all distracted the army fromquelling the Southern rebellion. In this highly originalcontribution to Civil War and gender history, Lorien Foote reveals that these internalbattles were fought against the backdrop of manhood. Clashing ideals ofmanliness produced myriad conflicts, as when educated, refined, and wealthyofficers ( gentlemen ) found themselves commanding a hard-drinking group offighters ( roughs )-a dynamic that often resulted in violence and even death. Basedon extensive research into heretofore ignored primary sources, The Gentlemen and the Roughs uncoversholes in our understanding of the men who fought the Civil War and the societythat produced them.
Format: Paperback
Pages: 256
Edition: Reprint
Publisher: New York University Press
Published: 25 Jun 2013
ISBN 10: 1479897841
ISBN 13: 9781479897841
Book Overview: Uncovers holes in our understanding of the men who fought the Civil War and the society that produced them
From hazing with mule urine to pistols at ten paces, Foote provides a lively portrait of `conduct unbecoming' and offers new insights into American masculinity in post-Civil War America.
-Catherine Clinton,author of Mrs. Lincoln: A Life
It is commonplace to observe that war is the ultimate test of the `manhood' of soldiers. But in the Civil War-as probably in all wars-the meaning of manhood was contested, as Lorien Foote makes clear in this fine study of Union soldiers. Making intelligent use of regimental reports and court-martial records, among other kinds of evidence, she teases out the various perceptions of manhood in this study that offers stimulating new interpretations of the values of soldiers in the broader context of American Victorian culture.
-James M. McPherson,author of the Pulitzer Prize-winning Battle Cry of Freedom: The Civil War Era
This might be the first `military history' to take gender seriously, as well as the first gender history to accord military history its due.
-Amy S. Greenberg,author of Manifest Manhood and the Antebellum American Empire