Scientific Reasoning and Argumentation: The Roles of Domain-Specific and Domain-General Knowledge

This excellent book brings together internationally renowned leaders across multiple fields to explore a critical question at the heart of education in a post-factual world. Specifically, understanding the complex interrelationships of domain-specific and general knowledge in scientific reasoning and argumentation is central to conceptualizing and re-organizing our approaches to education. The theoretical and pragmatic implications explored in this book reshape and define research and design of learning and learning environments for the coming century.

-Douglas Clark, Werklund Professor of Design-Based Learning at the University of Calgary, Canada

This book brings together experts in the field of scientific reasoning and argumentation to deconstruct a fundamental challenge facing our field: are there aspects of scientific reasoning and argumentation that are general in a way that enables their useful application across domains? Understanding the complexities of this vexation has implications for how we teach and evaluate our students as they learn with and about scientific reasoning and argumentation.

-Leema Berland, Associate Professor of Science Education at the University of Wisconsin at Madison, USA

In this timely volume, psychologists, educational researchers, and argumentation scholars move beyond the old dispute between domain-specific and domain-general knowledge. A series of ingenious case studies and broader models shows how these two types of knowledge interact and complement each other in the way scientists think and exchange arguments with each other.

-Hugo Mercier, Research Scientist at the French National Center for Scientific Research and co-author of The Enigma of Reason

In science education, we often slip into assuming that the argumentation and problem-solving skills we teach are general skills, smoothly transferable across academic and non-academic domains. This book's excellent choice of contributors takes on that assumption with depth and nuance.

-Andrew Elby, Associate Professor at the University of Maryland-College Park, USA