by JoanWeiner (Author)
Not only can the influence of Gottlob Frege (1848-1925) be found in contemporary work in logic, the philosophy of mathematics, and the philosophy of language, but his projects-and the very terminology he employed in pursuing those projects-are still current in contemporary philosophy. This is undoubtedly why it seems so reasonable to assume that we can read Frege' s writings as if he were one of us, speaking to our philosophical concerns in our language. In Joan Weiner's view, however, Frege's words can be accurately interpreted only if we set that assumption aside. Weiner here offers a challenging new approach to the philosophy of this central figure in analytic philosophy. Weiner finds in Frege's corpus, from Begriffsschrift (1879) on, a unified project of remarkable ambition to which each of the writings in that corpus makes a distinct contribution-a project whose motivation she brings to life through a careful reading of his Foundations of Arithmetic. The Frege that Weiner brings into clear view is very different from the familiar figure. Far from having originated one of the standard positions on the nature of reference, Frege turns out not to have had positive doctrines on anything like what contemporary philosophers mean by reference. Far from having served as a standard-bearer for those who take the realists' side of contemporary disputes with anti-realists, Frege turns out to have had no stake in either side of the controversy. Through Weiner's lens, Frege emerges as a thinker who has principled reasons for challenging the very assumptions and motivations that animate philosophers to dispute these doctrines.
This lucidly written and accessible book will generate controversy among all readers with an interest in epistemology, philosophy of language, history of philosophy, and the philosophy of mathematics.
Format: Paperback
Pages: 307
Publisher: Cornell University Press
Published: Sep 2008
ISBN 10: 0801475066
ISBN 13: 9780801475061
Joan Weiner reads Frege without assuming that his problems and concepts anticipate ours or that he is reacting to his historical context. This leads her to conclude that Frege's notion of reference differs importantly from that of today's philosophy of language and that his supposed Platonist declarations little support contemporary Platonism in the philosophy of mathematics. More radically, she holds that the bulk of Frege's so-called philosophical writings should be seen as attempting to elucidate his symbolic language and not as metaphysical and linguistic theories. Weiner deploys intricate, careful, and well-documented argument to defend these conclusions.
* The Philosophical Review *Like other scholars, Weiner registers more than a few reservations about Frege's works. However, as the title of her book shows, she believes that Frege's work still has great perspectives, and that present and future scholars will continue to derive from it threads for further meditations and researches. With great care, Weiner examines many of Frege's revolutionary theses and many of the problems he set out; approves or questions his solutions of these problems; and adds to Frege's solutions her own.
* Semiotica *Frege in Perspective is a remarkable and important book. It presents a revolutionary account of Frege's project which I believe will transform our understanding of Frege, and so of the origins of analytic philosophy. The view presented, while bold, is textually and philosophically sophisticated and very carefully made out. No one who writes on Frege can afford to ignore it.
-- Robert Brandom, University of Pittsburgh