Signs of Light: French and British Theories of Linguistic Communication, 1648-1789

Signs of Light: French and British Theories of Linguistic Communication, 1648-1789

by Matthew Lauzon (Author)

Synopsis

In Signs of Light, Matthew Lauzon traces the development of very different French and British ideas about language over the course of the late seventeenth and eighteenth centuries and demonstrates how important these ideas were to emerging notions of national character. Drawing examples from a variety of French and English language works in a wide range of areas, including language theory, philosophy, rhetoric, psychology, missionary tracts, and literary texts, Lauzon explores how French and British thinkers of the day developed arguments that certain kinds of languages are superior to others.

The nature of animal language and British and French understandings of the languages of North American Indians were vigorously debated. Theories of animal language juxtaposed the apparent virtues of transparency and wit; considerations of savage language resulted in eloquence being regarded as an even higher accomplishment. Eventually, the French language came to be prized for its wit and sociability and English for its simple clarity and vigor. Lauzon shows that, besides concerns about establishing the clarity of introspective representations, questions about the energetic communication of sincere emotion and about the sociable communication of wit were crucial to language theories during this period. A richly interdisciplinary work, Signs of Light is a compelling account of a formative period in language theory.

$99.97

Quantity

20+ in stock

More Information

Format: Hardcover
Pages: 256
Publisher: Cornell University Press
Published: 01 Jul 2010

ISBN 10: 0801448476
ISBN 13: 9780801448478

Media Reviews

Signs of Light shows Matthew Lauzon's extensive learning in a wide range of areas, including language theory, missionary tracts, and literary texts. He reorients our approach to early modern language theory in the direction of the study of processes of communication, as opposed to emphasizing the documentation of static ideals of transparency. -Laura Brown, Cornell University