The No1 Ethical retailer for Books, CD’s, DVD’s & Games
30 Day Refund Guarantee

The Paradox of American Unionism: Why Americans Like Unions More Than Canadians Do But Join Much Less

The Paradox of American Unionism: Why Americans Like Unions More Than Canadians Do But Join Much Less

by SeymourMartinLipset (Author), ThomasA.Kochan (Foreword), NoahM.Meltz (Author), RafaelGomez (Author), IvanKatchanovski (Author)

  • New

    Hardcover 2004

    $95.85
Synopsis

Why have Americans, who by a clear majority approve of unions, been joining them in smaller numbers than ever before? This book answers that question by comparing the American experience with that of Canada, where approval for unions is significantly lower than in the United States, but where since the mid-1960s workers have joined organized labor to a much greater extent. Given that the two countries are outwardly so similar, what explains this paradox? This book provides a detailed comparative analysis of both countries using, among other things, a detailed survey conducted in the United States and Canada by the Ipsos-Reid polling group.The authors explain that the relative reluctance of employees in the United States to join unions, compared with those in Canada, is rooted less in their attitudes toward unions than in the former country's deep-seated tradition of individualism and laissez-faire economic values. Canada has a more statist, social democratic tradition, which is in turn attributable to its Tory and European conservative lineage. Canadian values are therefore more supportive of unionism, making unions more powerful and thus, paradoxically, lowering public approval of unions. Public approval is higher in the United States, where unions exert less of an influence over politics and the economy.

$95.85

Quantity

20+ in stock

More Information

Format: Hardcover
 Pages: 208
 Publisher: Cornell University Press
Published: 29 Apr 2004
ISBN 10: 0801442001
ISBN 13: 9780801442001

Media Reviews
The authors suggest that at the heart of the discrepancies noted in the subtitle 'is the U.S. emphasis on individual freedom, combined with the peculiarities of Congressional government which makes changes to labor law very difficult.' They support this contention in well-written, well-documented chapters that use excellent statistical evidence to consider the political philosophies that have informed unions in the United States and Canada from their beginnings to the present. Recommended for academic, special, and large public libraries. -Library Journal, July 2004
Lipset and Meltz . . . conclude that lower union density in the US relative to Canada is based on America's individualistic, laissez-faire tradition and Canada's social democratic tradition. Their conclusions stem from a large telephone survey investigating comparative public attitudes in Canada and the US. -Choice, January 2005
Bold in their hypotheses, prudent in marshalling empirical evidence, this book's authors illuminate the differences in labor and society between Canada and the United States. The Paradox of American Unionism contains wonderful analysis by two giants in the social sciences, Seymour Martin Lipset and Noah M. Meltz. -Charles F. Doran, Andrew W. Mellon Professor of International Relations, School of Advanced International Studies, Johns Hopkins University
This book is destined to be a classic in industrial relations. It addresses the puzzle of why unions declined so precipitously in the United States but were sustained in Canada in spite of the similarities between the two countries. Canada and the United States provide a natural laboratory for examining the divergent paths of such important outcomes. -Morley Gunderson, CIBC Chair of Youth Employment, University of Toronto, Centre for Industrial Relations
The greatest strength of The Paradox of American Unionism is the sophisticated survey, based on large samples in both countries, that it brings to bear on the question, Why has U.S. union density fallen so dramatically, relative to that in Canada? The results of this survey challenge much conventional wisdom, including arguments hitherto advanced by Seymour Martin Lipset himself. These results provoke a restatement of his national political culture argument that must be addressed by those who develop this work over the next years. As well, the authors have pulled together an enormous amount of relevant historical and comparative data that will help readers to develop their own positions. -Ian Robinson, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor
Author Bio
The late Seymour Martin Lipset was Senior Fellow at the Hoover Institution, Stanford University; Senior Scholar at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars; and Hazel Professor of Public Policy and Sociology Emeritus at George Mason University. His numerous books include American Exceptionalism and Continental Divide. The late Noah M. Meltz was Principal of Woodsworth College and Professor Emeritus at the University of Toronto. Rafael Gomez is Lecturer at the London School of Economics and Research Fellow at the University of Toronto's Centre for Industrial Relations. Ivan Katchanovski is Kluge Post-Doctoral Fellow at the John W. Kluge Center, Library of Congress. Thomas A. Kochan is the George M. Bunker Professor of Work and Employment Relations at MIT's Sloan School of Management. His previous books include After Lean Production and The Transformation of American Industrial Relations, also from Cornell.