by Myra Jehlen (Author)
Fiction, far from being the opposite of truth, is wholly bent on finding it out, and writing novels is a way to know the real world as objectively as possible. In Five Fictions in Search of Truth, Myra Jehlen develops this idea through readings of works by Flaubert, James, and Nabokov. She invokes Proust's famous search for lost memory as the exemplary literary process, which strives, whatever its materials, for a true knowledge. In Salammbo, Flaubert digs up Carthage; in The Ambassadors, James plumbs the examined life and touches at its limits; while in Lolita, Nabokov traces a search for truth that becomes a trespass. In these readings, form and style emerge as fiction's means for taking hold of reality, which is to say that they are as epistemological as they are aesthetic, each one emerging by way of the other. The aesthetic aspects of a literary work are just so many instruments for exploring a subject, and the beauty and pleasure of a work confirm the validity of its account of the world. For Flaubert, famously, a beautiful sentence was proven true by its beauty. James and Nabokov wrote on the same assumption--that form and style were at once the origin and the confirmation of a work's truth. In Five Fictions in Search of Truth, Jehlen shows, moreover, that fiction's findings are not only about the world but immanent within it. Literature works concretely, through this form, that style, this image, that word, seeking a truth that is equally concrete. Writers write--and readers read--to discover an incarnate, secular knowledge, and in doing so they enact a basic concurrence between literature and science.
Format: Hardcover
Pages: 192
Edition: illustrated edition
Publisher: Princeton University Press
Published: 11 Aug 2008
ISBN 10: 0691136122
ISBN 13: 9780691136127
Book Overview: This book contributes to the important attempt that critics such as Elaine Scarry and Peter Brooks are now making to return aesthetic questions to the center of literary studies. Myra Jehlen writes throughout with clarity, grace, and an utter absence of jargon. Her endnotes show how well she knows the scholarship on Flaubert, James, and Nabokov, but she lets the scholarship stay in the notes and allows her own intelligence to work directly on these fictions. -- Michael Gorra, Smith College