by NicholasKaldor (Foreword), EsterBoserup (Author), VirginiaDeaneAbernethy (Foreword)
This book sets out to investigate the process of agrarian change from new angles and with new results. It starts on firm ground rather than from abstract economic theory. Upon its initial appearance, it was heralded as a small masterpiece, which economic historians should read--and not simply quote --Giovanni Frederico, Economic History Services.
The Conditions of Agricultural Growth remains a breakthrough in the theory of agricultural development. In linking ethnography with economy, developmental studies reached new heights. Whereas development had been seen previously as the transformation of traditional communities by the introduction (or imposition) of new technologies, Ester Boserup argues that changes and improvements occur from within agricultural communities, and that improvements are governed not simply by external interference, but by those communities themselves Using extensive analyses of the costs and productivity of the main systems of traditional agriculture, Ester Boserup concludes that technical, economic, and social changes are unlikely to take place unless the community concerned is exposed to the pressure of population growth.
Format: Paperback
Pages: 137
Edition: New edition
Publisher: AldineTransaction
Published: 30 Jun 2005
ISBN 10: 020230793X
ISBN 13: 9780202307930
This is a stimulating, even provocative book which should cause many social scientists and agriculturalists to revise, expand, or at least re-examine their views of the processes of agricultural change... The book is a new signpost along important roads of scholarship. It may be either accepted or refuted in whole or in part; it cannot be ignored.
--Clarence W. Olmstead, Economic Geography
This essay... [is] a most formative work in the theory of agricultural change. In it Mrs Boserup lifts the theory of agricultural development out of the rut of sterile discussion of land use and tenure, and sets it within an illuminating dynamic framework, which reveals the irrelevance of old squabbles by raising neglected but fundamental issues... Mrs Boserup writes with great rigour, economy and clarity.
--Charles M. Elliott, The Economic History Review
Bosserup's theory derives agricultural development in many pre-industrial societies from population growth: population growth is here regarded as the independent variable which in its turn is a major factor determining agricultural developments.. . A steadily increasing population within a given land area necessitates new agricultural techniques and more intensive land use in order to feed the expanding population... [Boserup] has justly brought attention to population growth as an essential factor in any model of societal development. This is a point frequently overlooked by anthropologists.
--Charles Sheffer, American Antiquity
It is always a pleasure to see a potent and useful text made more available, and Boserup's quondam revolutionary work is just that... Boserup's argument reversed the standard doctrine that in basic agrarian societies 'agricultural development controls population growth' and instead argued that population growth would determine agricultural development... Throughout, the argument is kept beautifully succinct. The points of contention are clearly indicated, leaving the reader free to develop counter arguments and add interpretation as the argument is developed; which makes for that rare object, an excellent, thought-provoking, teaching text.
--John F. Loder, Journal of Tropical Ecology
a classic in the development literature.
--Education in Science and Technology
essential reading in the context of the generally gloomy debate on the effects of population growth on poverty and the status of the environment.
--Development Policy Review
This is a stimulating, even provocative book which should cause many social scientists and agriculturalists to revise, expand, or at least re-examine their views of the processes of agricultural change... The book is a new signpost along important roads of scholarship. It may be either accepted or refuted in whole or in part; it cannot be ignored.
--Clarence W. Olmstead, Economic Geography
This essay... [is] a most formative work in the theory of agricultural change. In it Mrs Boserup lifts the theory of agricultural development out of the rut of sterile discussion of land use and tenure, and sets it within an illuminating dynamic framework, which reveals the irrelevance of old squabbles by raising neglected but fundamental issues... Mrs Boserup writes with great rigour, economy and clarity.
--Charles M. Elliott, The Economic History Review
Bosserup's theory derives agricultural development in many pre-industrial societies from population growth: population growth is here regarded as the independent variable which in its turn is a major factor determining agricultural developments.. . A steadily increasing population within a given land area necessitates new agricultural techniques and more intensive land use in order to feed the expanding population... [Boserup] has justly brought attention to population growth as an essential factor in any model of societal development. This is a point frequently overlooked by anthropologists.
--Charles Sheffer, American Antiquity
It is always a pleasure to see a potent and useful text made more available, and Boserup's quondam revolutionary work is just that... Boserup's argument reversed the standard doctrine that in basic agrarian societies 'agricultural development controls population growth' and instead argued that population growth would determine agricultural development... Throughout, the argument is kept beautifully succinct. The points of contention are clearly indicated, leaving the reader free to develop counter arguments and add interpretation as the argument is developed; which makes for that rare object, an excellent, thought-provoking, teaching text.
--John F. Loder, Journal of Tropical Ecology
a classic in the development literature.
--Education in Science and Technology
essential reading in the context of the generally gloomy debate on the effects of population growth on poverty and the status of the environment.
--Development Policy Review
-This is a stimulating, even provocative book which should cause many social scientists and agriculturalists to revise, expand, or at least re-examine their views of the processes of agricultural change... The book is a new signpost along important roads of scholarship. It may be either accepted or refuted in whole or in part; it cannot be ignored.-
--Clarence W. Olmstead, Economic Geography
-This essay... [is] a most formative work in the theory of agricultural change. In it Mrs Boserup lifts the theory of agricultural development out of the rut of sterile discussion of land use and tenure, and sets it within an illuminating dynamic framework, which reveals the irrelevance of old squabbles by raising neglected but fundamental issues... Mrs Boserup writes with great rigour, economy and clarity.-
--Charles M. Elliott, The Economic History Review
-Bosserup's theory derives agricultural development in many pre-industrial societies from population growth: -population growth is here regarded as the independent variable which in its turn is a major factor determining agricultural developments-... A steadily increasing population within a given land area necessitates new agricultural techniques and more intensive land use in order to feed the expanding population... [Boserup] has justly brought attention to population growth as an essential factor in any model of societal development. This is a point frequently overlooked by anthropologists.-
--Charles Sheffer, American Antiquity
-It is always a pleasure to see a potent and useful text made more available, and Boserup's quondam revolutionary work is just that... Boserup's argument reversed the standard doctrine that in basic agrarian societies 'agricultural development controls population growth' and instead argued that population growth would determine agricultural development... Throughout, the argument is kept beautifully succinct. The points of contention are clearly indicated, leaving the reader free to develop counter arguments and add interpretation as the argument is developed; which makes for that rare object, an excellent, thought-provoking, teaching text.-
--John F. Loder, Journal of Tropical Ecology
-a classic in the development literature.-
--Education in Science and Technology
-essential reading in the context of the generally gloomy debate on the effects of population growth on poverty and the status of the environment.-
--Development Policy Review